Response to reviewers

ثبت نشده
چکیده

We would like to thank both reviewers for their insightful comments and for their time. There were many editorial and typographic errors in the original manuscript which the reviewers pointed out and have been fixed, in the future closer attention to detail before submission will be paid. Reviewer 1’s comment asking us to consider potential energy has helped strengthen the results in the Geostrophic State section and helped show the effect that the initially leftward propagating wave has on the geostrophic state. This new result is extremely relevant to physical experiments and would not have been noticed without this comment. Reviewer 2’s comments about the nonlinear effects helped us develop a new section devoted to these effects. The new results indicate significant nonlinear effects in both the geostrophic state and the ejected waves for moderate to high Rossby numbers. They also provide a clearer connection to traditional nonlinear wave theory. We would like to note that significant changes to both the structure and details of the manuscript have been made and as such listing every change would be extremely difficult. In the response to each reviewer comment we have tried to indicate where the appropriate change has been made in the new manuscript. All of the comments provided were greatly appreciated and addressing them has significantly strengthened the manuscript.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Peer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers

The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...

متن کامل

ارزیابی میزان دقت داوران یکی از مجلات علمی پژوهشی فارسی زبان در تشخیص اصلاحات مورد نیاز یک مقاله علمی ارسالی؛ سال 1389

  Background and Objectives: Final corrections on a manuscript sent for publication in a scientific journal are suggested by reviewers. So this qualifies the paper with the least errors for publication. The present study aimed to assess the Persian language peer reviewers' comments on a manuscript sent to an Iranian Scientific Journal (journal of Rafsanjan university of medical sciences), 2010....

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016